v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "v0.31 Talk:Security design"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with '=='Security' vs 'Defense' Design== Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise…') |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --[[User:Retro|Retro]] 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :This makes great sense. I was messing with these articles earlier today and wasn't quite sure what to do with the dual defense articles. Nice work.--[[User:JohnnyMadhouse|JohnnyMadhouse]] 00:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:35, 12 April 2010
'Security' vs 'Defense' Design
Having a 'defense design' and 'defense guide' article was ridiculous name-wise. This one was about how to make your layout better defense-wise, so 'security' seemed an appropriate kind-of-synonym. Already managed the redirects so it links up to the 40d Defense Guide (and it to this page) fine. --Retro 00:20, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- This makes great sense. I was messing with these articles earlier today and wasn't quite sure what to do with the dual defense articles. Nice work.--JohnnyMadhouse 00:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)