v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing v0.31 Talk:Ranger
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "v0.31"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Dwarves probably get known for a specific skill when their experience in that skill is greater than a certain percentage of all of their experience within the entire profession. Using the cumulative experience values listed on [[Experience]] might be useful in determining the actual cutoff points. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 18:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | :Dwarves probably get known for a specific skill when their experience in that skill is greater than a certain percentage of all of their experience within the entire profession. Using the cumulative experience values listed on [[Experience]] might be useful in determining the actual cutoff points. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 18:02, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
::Looks good. What you say about experience might be right, I've never tried to test against three things, usually just two. The reword is better, I think.--[[User:Kwieland|Kwieland]] 10:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | ::Looks good. What you say about experience might be right, I've never tried to test against three things, usually just two. The reword is better, I think.--[[User:Kwieland|Kwieland]] 10:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| − | :Sorry, my fault, I copied it from the 40d info, assuming it didn't change. I checked other | + | :Sorry, my fault, I copied it from the 40d info, assuming it didn't change. I checked other DF2010 profession pages and saw the sentence listed there, which made me think someone has already verified it. My bad. --[[User:Markus cz|Markus cz]] 12:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC) |
::I don't think it was true in 40d either, but I have not verified that. I've been looking at it and I can verify if they are two away (proficient to adept, say) then they assume the more general title, I've got to check for three/more.--[[User:Kwieland|Kwieland]] 21:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | ::I don't think it was true in 40d either, but I have not verified that. I've been looking at it and I can verify if they are two away (proficient to adept, say) then they assume the more general title, I've got to check for three/more.--[[User:Kwieland|Kwieland]] 21:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC) | ||