v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Used"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
(→Re: Ratings: new section) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Game data template== | ==Game data template== | ||
I appreciate what you were trying to do, but the only way to get the template to behave requires fix widths. I've rolled back your changes until I have a chance to look at it again to fix things. Also, the changes you made break multiple other templates that include this template, which will all need to be fixed first before fixing this one. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 09:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | I appreciate what you were trying to do, but the only way to get the template to behave requires fix widths. I've rolled back your changes until I have a chance to look at it again to fix things. Also, the changes you made break multiple other templates that include this template, which will all need to be fixed first before fixing this one. --[[User:Briess|Briess]] 09:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Re: Ratings == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I understand what you mean by not just re-rating, but keep in mind most of the articles I'm re-rating are stone articles, which have been determined in the Quality talk to be worth an ≡Exceptional≡ rating if they have the necessary gamedata information. | ||
| + | |||
| + | As for other articles I've rated, I also added to them in most cases. | ||
Revision as of 20:57, 8 June 2010
Game data template
I appreciate what you were trying to do, but the only way to get the template to behave requires fix widths. I've rolled back your changes until I have a chance to look at it again to fix things. Also, the changes you made break multiple other templates that include this template, which will all need to be fixed first before fixing this one. --Briess 09:26, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
Re: Ratings
I understand what you mean by not just re-rating, but keep in mind most of the articles I'm re-rating are stone articles, which have been determined in the Quality talk to be worth an ≡Exceptional≡ rating if they have the necessary gamedata information.
As for other articles I've rated, I also added to them in most cases.