v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Main page progress bar"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m (Undo revision 99298 by Oddtwang of Dork (Talk))
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Good work on this, obviously you're ironing out some details but I can see where it's going and I'm all for it. [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 01:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
Good work on this, obviously you're ironing out some details but I can see where it's going and I'm all for it. [[User:Mason11987|Mason]] <sup>([[User talk:Mason11987|T]]-[[Special:Contributions/Mason11987|C]])</sup> 01:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
  
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). 20:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
+
Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). [[User:Oddtwang of Dork|Oddtwang of Dork]] 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:06, 25 April 2010

I like this

Good work on this, obviously you're ironing out some details but I can see where it's going and I'm all for it. Mason (T-C) 01:47, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Neat idea. I took the liberty of adding a link to the article quality page for anyone who was thinking "how did they decide that?". Might be worth getting some sort of estimate of how many articles are unrated (of the ones in the main, DF2010 and 40d namespaces I'dve thought - maybe just the main and DF2010 ones in fact). Oddtwang of Dork 20:03, 25 April 2010 (UTC)