Editing 40d Talk:Cross-training

=Segregation=
It is normaly a good idea to seperate your non-cross-trained from your cross-trained, otherwise you end up with flying limbs. --[[User:Derekiv|Derekiv]] 12:13 22 December 2009 (GMT-5)

=Pump operator notes=
Not sure the toughness note is really that important.  The gym is just used for dwarven stat gains, so dwarves are beefy enough to excell at whatever you throw at them.  It scarcely matters how well they pump, just so long as they get to Legendary to be reassigned to the military or something else.  I've noticed gym graduates make fantastic hunters for example. --[[User:ThunderClaw|ThunderClaw]] 17:47, 3 November 2008 (EST)

:Well, it makes pump-training far more effective for dwarves that are already tough: they can hit legendary in a season or two, where other dwarves take about a year.  So if you have a finite number of dwarves you can spare for training, choose tough ones.  Strong ones can be put in plate and made to spar, or turned into siege operators.

:Currently I'm training all my haulers, in shifts.  Ones that gain toughness get to keep pumping until they're ready for the military.  Strong ones get stone hauling duty.  Everyone else gets food, item, or refuse duty.--[[User:Maximus|Maximus]] 20:06, 3 November 2008 (EST)

:: I now give all my haulers the custom profession ''ROTC.'' --[[User:RomeoFalling|RomeoFalling]] 07:50, 8 November 2008 (EST)

::: I've been trying cross-training, and I'm not really seeing much point at the moment.  The thing is, sparring practices three skills ''at the same time'': Armor user, the weapon you're using, and shield user.  The gym's rate of stat gain is almost the same as regularly sparring dwarves.  And military dwarves are useful for something.  [[User:Greep|Greep]] 09:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

::::The "point" is several - 1) that some players don't want to put non-Attribute (or at least, non-Tough) dwarves directly into sparring; 2) that some players want military with more than "one-skill-worth" of training attributes under their belts; 3) that some players want to see what the attribute mix is on a dwarf ''before'' allocating to training (vs hauling/etc); and, 4) it's ''cross''-training.  Military dwarves aren't useful for anything ''but'' military - that's the "cross" part.  There are several suggestions other than pump operator - use them or not - your call. --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 18:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

:::::Alright, I guess gym training just isn't for me.  But as for the one skill worth of attribute training, I thought attributes continued to rise even after legendary + 5.  Like an uber miner would eventually gain 16 attributes? That's what the stat page seems to indicate [[User:Greep|Greep]] 06:16, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

If you make two pumps, one above the other (Y axis, not Z), facing apposing directions, dig 2 channels at each end, making a 2X8 space, you can not only increase toughness and pump operator skill, but get happy [[waterfall]] [[thoughts]]. --[[User:Drunken dwarf|Drunken dwarf]]

=Dwarf Powered Mill notes=
Actually, it is better not to cook seeds. As seeds have quantity cap at 200 seeds for each plant, milling will not produce seeds after you hit the cap. It saves a visible amount of food hauler's work. [[User:Denspb|Denspb]] 02:58, 25 February 2009 (EST)


== Managing ==

Assigning a dwarf to manager may be even better than clerking. I had two useless dwarves. Assigned one to clerk, another to manager+broker. Disabled hauling jobs for the manager. I then went to the manager screen and queued up a full screen of "Make Soap x30." I chose soap because I don't even have an alchemist's workshop and I didn't want any jobs assigned to existing workshops and disrupting work flow. I lost track of how many times I had to go back in and cancel/re-issue the soap orders. The manager reached legendary while the clerk was still a pathetic high master. I didn't measure steps, but their offices and bedrooms were all very close together, should be around 5-10 steps difference for each dwarf to go get food/drink.

Other factors:
<br>-Clerk has a husband (no kids), manager is single
<br>-Clerk went on break at least once
<br>-Hauling was still enabled for the clerk, not sure if she did any jobs though
<br>-At the beginning, Clerk had no skills, Manager had Normal Skill Wood Carving (not much good on my treeless map)
<br>-Manager met with human diplomat and traded at depot during training

--[[User:Mjo625|Mjo625]] 17:18, 2 March 2009 (EST)

== Chit-chatting ==

Having no meeting halls (well rooms, statue gardens etc) at all, and just having a single 1x1 meeting area REALLY boosted my haulers stats. I might not be the most efficient assigner of work orders, but some of the time most of my haulers were out of work and just spent their time at the meeting area chatting. I had a lot of proficient-or-higher in EVERY social skill within a couple of years. This might be an exploit. Thoughts? [[User:Tardface|Tardface]] 22:53, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

: Yes and no. Chatting dwarfs make friends... and if some dies... Well, you'll have a nice domino effect. Dwarf don't like to lose friends.  --[[User:Karl|Karl]] 23:12, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

:: So, dwarves will actually be happier overall if you don't let them have any friends? :) [[User:Tardface|Tardface]] 23:15, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

:::In the long-run (which inevitably includes many random deaths) yes.. very much so. Rather few, are the fortresses that can survive a death among legendary haulers, and fewer still are those than can survive several. --[[User:N9103|Edward]] 21:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

::::Not really. Random deaths are not exactly inevitable unless you want them to be, and party forts are pretty resilient when it comes to a couple odd deaths: everyone is racking up "talked to a friend lately" thoughts like crazy, so even if a few deaths push them down to miserable they will bounce back up to ecstatic in about a minute. The danger is that if you have more than a couple of deaths at once, the immediate surge in unhappiness may cause spontaneous insanity, which will lead to more deaths... [[User:Rpb|Rpb]] 11:09, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
:::::Thoughts don't stack on themselves, so you can only get one "talked to a friend recently" thought at one time.  The wisdom of having dwarves too busy to make friends is still the best, hands down. --[[User:ThunderClaw|ThunderClaw]] 16:53, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

== Swimming ==

Has anybody considered stationing dwarves in an area with 4/7 water, thus giving them skill in swimming? Beds could be constructed in this area prior, turned into a barracks and if a food/booze stockpile is placed there aswell, the dwaves could be locked in there and would then perform all the normal sparring activities while at the same time constantly gaining swimming skill. --[[User:Overspeculated|Overspeculated]] 00:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
:I successfully trained dwarfs in 7/7 water before.  I filled a 5x5 space one z level down from a 15x15 statue garden with water and surrounded with ramps.  Although the dwarfs frequently fell in, they were never far away from the sides and thus never drowned.  (Although a cow managed to drown there and create quite a funk with the miasma since no one would wade in to dump the corpse--I'm still not sure how that happened since the dwarfs had no problem with it.) [[User:3lB33|3lB33]] 01:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes, but would military dwarves still perform sparring activities if their barracks was 4/7 under water? (where they can wade or swim) eventually raising that level once they are good enough at swimming. I'm testing it out as soon as I get my flooding mechanism done (I'm still new to this game so that takes quite a while for me) --[[User:Overspeculated|Overspeculated]] 12:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)

== Forest Gulag ==

I have set my fortress in an area with:
# volcano
# steep "low mountain" (entrance is on top of course)
# sand
# canyon (like "Grand Canyon")
# chasm (on the "wrong side" of the Grand Canyon thankfully)
# A forest covers my side of the "Grand Canyon"
# Elephants wander through periodically, and I have some tame ones now too.

What I want to know is, what is the best way to use the forest to build experience. I'm happy to clear-fell the forest then start again from the beginning, but the fact is I am having a hard time so far keeping the wagon pathway clear as it is. I NEED MORE AXES! (getting there.)

For my non-woodcutter dwarves: what should they do with the lumber to get the most experience without making junk all over the place?

Do I make a stack of asherys, to make potash, to make clear glass "later"?
<font face="FixedSys" color="#00FFFF">[[User:GarrieIrons|Gar]]</font>[[User Talk:GarrieIrons|rie]] 11:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

:Given the lack of answers to date my best bet seems to be:
:#clear-fell forest
:#Construct carpenter workshop from wood. Assign workshop to not lower skilled carpenters.
:#Build wooden weapons usable for weapon traps
:#have other dwarves constructing mechanisms
:#construct weapon traps using wooden weapons
:<font face="FixedSys" color="#00FFFF">[[User:GarrieIrons|Gar]]</font>[[User Talk:GarrieIrons|rie]] 10:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
::Alternatively, if you're planning on making lots of clear glass, you can make all of the ashes into lye - you can fit 100 units of lye in a single barrel, which saves lots of storage space. Plus, you can also use the lye for making soap, if you are inclined. --[[User:Quietust|Quietust]] 12:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
::You can't build wooden weapon. Only the elves have the secret to build them without hurting trees... Damn hippies. Yet you could build menacing wooden spikes or stuff like that... but... Wood only do half damage, so it's a waste of wood and your trap are not going to be really effective.  You could instead do it with glass, a lot more step needed to have the same result, but it's way more fun, and you can build a lot of stuff from clear glass. 
:: Since there's a limit to the number of tree you can fell, and since they don't grow fast enough (if you have 5-10 good woodcutters) you should had more step in the process to use a lot of dwarf, hence the clear glass production.
:: By the way, obsidian and wood make good rock sword, and it's as good as steel, if you have access to water, you could build an obsidian farm. --[[User:Karl|Karl]] 15:00, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

:::This is ideas for a forest gulag as such they don't have to be practical!
:::While wooden weapons are not very efficient, if you can make a stack of them out in the boonies then all you have to cart in from underground is 1 mechanism per trap. So your (gulag) treecutter cuts down 10 trees per trap, your (gulag) carpenter makes 10 wooden spikes per trap, and your mechanic (knowing my fortresses, my ONLY mechanic) makes traps once some other poor sot drages the mechnisms out there. With a nice little wooden fence to restrict pathing a few weapon traps even with wooden spikes should do SOMETHING shouldn't they?
:::My three treecutters aren't keeping the boundary of 1/2 of my map clear of trees, let alone clear felling the entire map. These guys are full-time treecutters! '''Waste of wood''' is relative to the map, it is better (safer, less hauling) to ask for wood and sell traders the clothes from the invaders to actually get wood into the fortress (1 silk shirt buys 200 or so logs!).
:::<font face="FixedSys" color="#00FFFF">[[User:GarrieIrons|Gar]]</font>[[User Talk:GarrieIrons|rie]] 11:11, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
::::I have had very good results with spiked wooden balls.  A trap containing 10 of them almost always kills a goblin in one hit.  A bottleneck containing a few rows of such traps can easily cripple a goblin siege before it even gets near your fortress.  --[[User:LaVacaMorada|LaVacaMorada]] 11:49, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
::::You can use the wood to pave a road for the wagons. That'll suck up material pretty good, and keep the wagon pathway clear, but train a carpenter. Personally, I can never get enough charcoal, but I'm metal-happy. [[User:Darekun|Darekun]] 08:29, 18 March 2010 (UTC)