- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
Difference between revisions of "40d:Macro design"
(Grammer fixes, and typing mistakes) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Playing Dwarf Fortress means lots of typing. Macros should likewise mean a lot of planing, hence a design. This page is to go over the design issues when creating a macro and how to avoid problems and slow/massive code. The design of the operation/structure that you creating a macro for this page will not help you. You should be most familiar with it though as you've probably typed it in hundreds of times before bothering to turn it into a macro. | + | Playing Dwarf Fortress means lots of typing. Macros should likewise mean a lot of planing, hence a design. This page is to go over the design issues when creating a macro and how to avoid problems and slow/massive code. The design of the operation/structure that you creating a macro for, this page will not help you. You should be most familiar with it though, as you've probably typed it in hundreds of times before bothering to turn it into a macro. |
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
=Planing= | =Planing= | ||
| − | Design is all about planning ahead of time to achieve a better result than simply 'winging it'. There are thousands of ways to do the exact same thing, but with a design we would like to pick the best or near-best solution. In the case of DF's macros we want to see our macro run in the fewest steps possible, | + | Design is all about planning ahead of time to achieve a better result than simply 'winging it'. There are thousands of ways to do the exact same thing, but with a design, we would like to pick the best or near-best solution. In the case of DF's macros we want to see our macro run in the fewest steps possible, getting the most out of each command. |
| − | Start by planning out | + | Start by planning out your design as series of steps to create the final result. Then code each step individuality, while taking note of the before/after steps. Like the complete macro, each step has many possible different coding solutions. Try to pick one that is simple (short) but also goes best with the step before it, and will end, where its advantageous for the next step. Try to keep a step to a single type of operation, this will save the time of continuously switching between modes. |
| − | :Example: Fields (Boxes\area-selections) have four corners. Your code traverses from one corner to the opposite to define the field | + | :Example: Fields (Boxes\area-selections) have four corners. Your code traverses from one corner to the opposite corner to define the field. It doesn't matter which corner you start at. So pick a start and stop point of you field, that's good for the next or previous (or both) step(s). This saves a lot of time spent walking the cursor around. |
=Repeats= | =Repeats= | ||
| − | Command repetition is only a coding short hand. The following scripts are identical in the time it takes them to execute. | + | Command repetition is only a coding short hand. The following scripts are identical, in the time it takes them to execute. |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:20] | [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:20] | ||
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
=Movement= | =Movement= | ||
| − | Most of the time a macro takes to run is moving the cursor around. This can be sped up through the use of the "_FAST" versions of the move | + | Most of the time a macro takes to run is moving the cursor around. This can be sped up through the use of the "_FAST" versions of the move commands and by moving diagonally |
==Standard Movement== | ==Standard Movement== | ||
| − | There is a "_FAST" version of every cursor command. "_FAST" movement jumps ten squares in the same time a normal movement takes to travel on square. This the same as holding the | + | There is a "_FAST" version of every cursor command. "_FAST" movement jumps ten squares in the same time a normal movement command takes to travel on square. This the same as holding the {{key|Shift}} key the the game UI. |
The following code, | The following code, | ||
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:3] | [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:3] | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | is the exact same action in only | + | is the exact same action in only 4 commands |
==Back Peddling== | ==Back Peddling== | ||
| − | When the 1's digit is higher than 5 backing up can achieve faster run times | + | When the 1's digit is higher than 5, backing the cursor up can achieve faster run times. |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:38] | [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:38] | ||
| Line 74: | Line 74: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | Is the exact cursor change but in only 6 moves (nearly half). This can have side effects however (covered below) and must be done carefully. | + | Is the exact same cursor position change but in only 6 moves (nearly half). This can have side effects however (covered below) and must be done carefully. |
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | This | + | This dropped the command count from 16 to 8. It also works for non-squares too. |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| Line 110: | Line 110: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | So | + | So from 38 commands to just 7, with a little planning. |
Diagonal movement commands are written as Vertical then Horizontal with no separating "_" | Diagonal movement commands are written as Vertical then Horizontal with no separating "_" | ||
=Cursor Return= | =Cursor Return= | ||
| − | When designing your script its a idea to plan where to leave off. The two common ideas | + | When designing your script its a good idea to plan, where to leave off. The two common ideas are, |
*Back where the script started, which is less disorienting to the user. | *Back where the script started, which is less disorienting to the user. | ||
| − | *In position for an instant repeat of the macro, if | + | *In position for an instant repeat of the macro, if that makes sense for this macro. |
| − | :If | + | :If your macro makes a 3 square wide section of hallway to the left, then put the end the cursor in position to allow for a repeat call of the macro to add a second section. |
Both are better than just stopping the cursor wherever it happens to be. | Both are better than just stopping the cursor wherever it happens to be. | ||
| Line 136: | Line 136: | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | Those are 4's not 5's. The cursors current position | + | Those are 4's not 5's. The cursors current position is always 1, since it's really movement your defining not a size. Its an easy concept but also easy to forget/mess up. |
==Edge Collision== | ==Edge Collision== | ||
| − | Edge Collision can be helpful in several situations. When you hit a edge you stop there, no matter how far your script wants to travel that way. This is per command and if your not expecting to hit a wall, it will corrupt that | + | Edge Collision can be helpful in several situations. When you hit a edge you stop there, no matter how far your script wants to travel that way. This is per command and if your not expecting to hit a wall, it will corrupt that exeicution of the script. There is no way to avoid this. And in most cases, it's the script-runner's fault not the script-designer's. |
| − | However as a designer you can run into trouble with | + | However as a designer you can run into trouble with back peddling optimizations as mentioned above. Back peddling can jump you out of the working area of your script and then return, as long as there is enough extra space around your script area to do so. If an edge happens to be there, instant problem. |
| − | :If your scrip is made inside a 17x4 rectangle, getting across it with the following, | + | :If your scrip is made inside a 17x4 rectangle, getting across it with the following code, |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
[MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:2] | [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:2] | ||
[MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3] | [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3] | ||
</pre> | </pre> | ||
| − | + | is fine, as long as an edge wasn't 19 squares away. | |
| − | + | It's recommend to only use back peddling that does not go outside of your script's work area. | |
| − | With | + | With back peddling movements, that are larger than 10 spaces, a simple change of order of operations can fix this issue. Here is the above example, with an order changes |
<pre> | <pre> | ||
| Line 171: | Line 171: | ||
This is the same run time/#commands, yet the cursor says inside the script area. | This is the same run time/#commands, yet the cursor says inside the script area. | ||
| − | :For script areas of 6, 7, 8, or 9 your just out of luck and I would suggest not | + | :For script areas of 6, 7, 8, or 9 your just out of luck and I would suggest not back peddling, but with a script area so small, speed isn't that much of an issue. |
| − | :The | + | :The back peddling "LEFT:3" command, travels over the same area the previous "_FAST" command had covered. If it had been placed first, the cursor would have back peddled out the other side. |
Revision as of 05:37, 12 November 2009
Playing Dwarf Fortress means lots of typing. Macros should likewise mean a lot of planing, hence a design. This page is to go over the design issues when creating a macro and how to avoid problems and slow/massive code. The design of the operation/structure that you creating a macro for, this page will not help you. You should be most familiar with it though, as you've probably typed it in hundreds of times before bothering to turn it into a macro.
Macro Delay
Its been seen on the forums, and on this wiki where macros take a long time, and in some instances hours to run. The stated solution is to change an 'erroneous' leftover tag MACRO_MS in \data\init\init.txt from 150 to 0. The game as shipped includes no preset macros so the default init is set to a value that the human player can see each move as they debug any mistakes in the first macro they create. Most macros on any system commonly run better with some delay between commands; a MACRO_MS:1 seems to be a good run-time setting.
Planing
Design is all about planning ahead of time to achieve a better result than simply 'winging it'. There are thousands of ways to do the exact same thing, but with a design, we would like to pick the best or near-best solution. In the case of DF's macros we want to see our macro run in the fewest steps possible, getting the most out of each command.
Start by planning out your design as series of steps to create the final result. Then code each step individuality, while taking note of the before/after steps. Like the complete macro, each step has many possible different coding solutions. Try to pick one that is simple (short) but also goes best with the step before it, and will end, where its advantageous for the next step. Try to keep a step to a single type of operation, this will save the time of continuously switching between modes.
- Example: Fields (Boxes\area-selections) have four corners. Your code traverses from one corner to the opposite corner to define the field. It doesn't matter which corner you start at. So pick a start and stop point of you field, that's good for the next or previous (or both) step(s). This saves a lot of time spent walking the cursor around.
Repeats
Command repetition is only a coding short hand. The following scripts are identical, in the time it takes them to execute.
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:20]
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:1]
While it's much easier to read the condensed version, but to DF, its the same in every other way.
Movement
Most of the time a macro takes to run is moving the cursor around. This can be sped up through the use of the "_FAST" versions of the move commands and by moving diagonally
Standard Movement
There is a "_FAST" version of every cursor command. "_FAST" movement jumps ten squares in the same time a normal movement command takes to travel on square. This the same as holding the Shift key the the game UI. The following code,
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:33]
is the same as 33 moving commands however,
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP_FAST:3] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:3]
is the exact same action in only 4 commands
Back Peddling
When the 1's digit is higher than 5, backing the cursor up can achieve faster run times.
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:38] Goes to [MACRO:CURSOR_UP_FAST:3] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:8] Brings 38 commands down to just 11, however this can be better optimized by backing up. [MACRO:CURSOR_UP_FAST:4] [MACRO:CURSOR_Down:2]
Is the exact same cursor position change but in only 6 moves (nearly half). This can have side effects however (covered below) and must be done carefully.
Diagonal Movement
Most people using modern computers are spoiled with their Tetris(TM) shaped, arrow key block. The number pad has arrows too, and on a select few keyboards the 1 3 7 9 keys have arrows as well. It doesn't matter if your keyboard has arrows on it or not to DF, you can move with the 1 3 7 9 keys so we can also code diagonal movement in our macros too.
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:8] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT:8] can be replaced by [MACRO:CURSOR_UPRIGHT:8]
This dropped the command count from 16 to 8. It also works for non-squares too.
[MACRO:CURSOR_UP:12] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT:16] can be replaced by [MACRO:CURSOR_UPRIGHT:12] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT:4]
This saved us 12 unneeded commands.
The "_FAST" works in the game and in your scripts on diagonals too. Further bringing down the the previous example command count to just,
[MACRO:CURSOR_UPRIGHT_FAST:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_UPRIGHT:2] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT:4]
So from 38 commands to just 7, with a little planning.
Diagonal movement commands are written as Vertical then Horizontal with no separating "_"
Cursor Return
When designing your script its a good idea to plan, where to leave off. The two common ideas are,
- Back where the script started, which is less disorienting to the user.
- In position for an instant repeat of the macro, if that makes sense for this macro.
- If your macro makes a 3 square wide section of hallway to the left, then put the end the cursor in position to allow for a repeat call of the macro to add a second section.
Both are better than just stopping the cursor wherever it happens to be.
Problems to avoid
A step to far
When your script doesn't run as planned, check if you went to far on a movement action. To make a 5x5 box the code is
//written for ease of reading [MACRO:SELECT:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:4] [MACRO:CURSOR_UP:4] [MACRO:SELECT:1]
Those are 4's not 5's. The cursors current position is always 1, since it's really movement your defining not a size. Its an easy concept but also easy to forget/mess up.
Edge Collision
Edge Collision can be helpful in several situations. When you hit a edge you stop there, no matter how far your script wants to travel that way. This is per command and if your not expecting to hit a wall, it will corrupt that exeicution of the script. There is no way to avoid this. And in most cases, it's the script-runner's fault not the script-designer's. However as a designer you can run into trouble with back peddling optimizations as mentioned above. Back peddling can jump you out of the working area of your script and then return, as long as there is enough extra space around your script area to do so. If an edge happens to be there, instant problem.
- If your scrip is made inside a 17x4 rectangle, getting across it with the following code,
[MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:2] [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3]
is fine, as long as an edge wasn't 19 squares away.
It's recommend to only use back peddling that does not go outside of your script's work area.
With back peddling movements, that are larger than 10 spaces, a simple change of order of operations can fix this issue. Here is the above example, with an order changes
[MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:2] [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3] is really just [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3] so we can reorder it to [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:1] [MACRO:CURSOR_LEFT:3] [MACRO:CURSOR_RIGHT_FAST:1]
This is the same run time/#commands, yet the cursor says inside the script area.
- For script areas of 6, 7, 8, or 9 your just out of luck and I would suggest not back peddling, but with a script area so small, speed isn't that much of an issue.
- The back peddling "LEFT:3" command, travels over the same area the previous "_FAST" command had covered. If it had been placed first, the cursor would have back peddled out the other side.