v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Native platinum
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:: Thanks! I've corrected the article. [[User:Noctis|Noctis]] 10:40, 21 November 2007 (EST) | :: Thanks! I've corrected the article. [[User:Noctis|Noctis]] 10:40, 21 November 2007 (EST) | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
== Mason == | == Mason == | ||
Line 49: | Line 46: | ||
== Veins/clusters == | == Veins/clusters == | ||
I found a small cluster (7 tiles) of native platinum, in the middle of an olivine deposit. Only mod used was reveal. Fixing. [[User:Decius|Decius]] 19:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | I found a small cluster (7 tiles) of native platinum, in the middle of an olivine deposit. Only mod used was reveal. Fixing. [[User:Decius|Decius]] 19:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :I made a similar "mistake" - but I think this is valid. The template info comes from the RAW's - how the relationship between a stone and or is defined in the game files. And for olivine, those are defined only as veins. But I've seen small clusters in olivine too often - something else has to be going on. Perhaps the olivine is somehow "inheriting" the small clusters from the parent gabbro layer - dunno, might be considered a bug, but it's there, and has been witnessed too many times to discount. --[[User:Albedo|Albedo]] 22:20, 22 May 2009 (UTC) | |
− | :I made a similar "mistake" - but I think this is valid. The template info comes from the RAW's - how the relationship between a stone and | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |