v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
  • v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
  • Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.

Difference between revisions of "40d Talk:Carpenter"

From Dwarf Fortress Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
As far as I know, yes.    --[[User:Sev|Sev]] 22:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 
As far as I know, yes.    --[[User:Sev|Sev]] 22:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I believe [[block]]s may only be used for [[construction]]s (like walls and floors) and may not be made into beds or burned for fuel, etc. --[[User:Calculator|Calculator]] 04:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
  
 
== Data like the Mason's page? ==
 
== Data like the Mason's page? ==

Revision as of 04:07, 14 January 2010

How do the wooden shields produced by a carpenter compare to standard metal shields? Gairabad 20:11, 15 November 2008 (EST)

They're half as good as iron shields. The mod values are: Steel 133%, iron 100%, bronze 75%, copper 66%, anything else 50%. What 'half as good' means is unclear. They probably have the same block chance, but simply block less damage.--Navian 20:27, 15 November 2008 (EST)

Blocks

Can't find a mention of this anywhere.. Can wooden blocks, that can be made in the carpenter's workshop, be used for everything that you can use normal logs for? -- D64 20:18, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

As far as I know, yes. --Sev 22:20, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

I believe blocks may only be used for constructions (like walls and floors) and may not be made into beds or burned for fuel, etc. --Calculator 04:07, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Data like the Mason's page?

I noticed that the Mason's page has a detailed explanation of what grants experience, is effected by quality, and other important info that regards to masons. Since carpenters can also do a lot of the same tasks Mason's can, do you think we should try to get the same info for this page?Kenji 03 17:44, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Mason's page "We"? As in "you"? Sure! "Should"? Meh, it can't hurt, so... sure, why not? If an edit adds to the factual information without being redundant (copying info found and better belonging elsewhere), it only improves the page and adds to the power of the wiki. --Albedo 17:56, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

Just make sure not to just copy all the exp amounts explained in the Mason's page assuming that they're going to be the same. You'd need to actually find the experience amounts, because you never know when something could be different than expected.