User:CptFastbreak - Revision history

CptFastbreak at 15:31, 31 July 2014

2014-07-31T15:31:50Z

CptFastbreak at 17:06, 25 May 2009

2009-05-25T17:06:08Z

CptFastbreak at 14:20, 24 May 2009

2009-05-24T14:20:54Z

CptFastbreak: Created page with '=My current thoughts on design strategy= I tend to forget my thoughts on design strategy in between fortress builds, so I put them here. ==Defense== My next fortress will use a "...'

2009-05-24T14:03:29Z

Created page with '=My current thoughts on design strategy= I tend to forget my thoughts on design strategy in between fortress builds, so I put them here. ==Defense== My next fortress will use a "...'

New page

=My current thoughts on design strategy=
I tend to forget my thoughts on design strategy in between fortress builds, so I put them here.
==Defense==
My next fortress will use a "three lane" approach to fortress defense: three mutually exclusive routes that lead into my fort.

* Defcon 1, Ambush lane: this is normally open to the public. It is a three tile wide, heavily trapped corridor leading directly to the trade depot. The trade depot has to be open to wagons all the time, otherwise trader wagons will not even enter the map. The purpose of this path is to take care of any unpleasant surprise such as snatchers, thieves, and ambushes.
* Defcon 0, Trader lane: this path is opened when traders enter the map. It is a three tile wide corridor with no traps leading directly to the trade depot for the traders to bring us wood and useless crap. The traders' guards are capable of taking care of ambushes on their own.
* Defcon 2, Siege lane: this path is opened when a siege should be fought back. It will possibly only be 1-2 tiles wide, and should ideally be somehow exposed to the sunlight to order dwarves out of it. The outer approach should be covered by catapults, the inner lane by ballistas, toss a guard tower with marksdwarves somewhere in there, maybe traps but that might be overkill. The path leads to the barracks, where the military will be glad for an interesting break from sparring sessions.

Other ideas:
* Chain recon dogs in windowed towers all around the map. Drawback: needs a lot of towers on a large site; Advantage: Reduces the system to only two defcons, allows outside work
* Let siege lane lead to a chained bait animal instead of to the barracks. Drawback: unemployment for military, might be unnecessary depending on the defense status
* Make siege lane magma floodable to get rid of any gobbo crap dropped there. Drawback: needs replenishable magma source, more work, less fps due to fluid movement. Advantage: magma.

==Bedroom/workshop design==
For my last two fortresses I used the [[Bedroom_Design#Decentralized_Living|decentralized living]] plan along with [[Design_strategies#Decentralized_Workshop_Complex|decentralized workshops]]. I had four work/living complexes more or less symmetrically around a central grand dining hall. The big advantage is that it accomodates for various workshop area constraints, e.g. having the butchery close to the surface for a refuse area vent, the kitchen near the farm near the soil area, but the forges close to the magma. Two major drawbacks are the necessity of complex micro management for the bedrooms, and the increased complexity of the noise problem. Placing a tower cap farm can be tricky when there are bedrooms everywhere.

Extensions of the decentralized layout:
* There should be a central finished goods stockpile close to the depot to have all those ''x(narrow giant cave spider silk socks)x'' and ''x(small alligator leather loincloths)x'' in time there for the foreign perverts that call themselves traders.
* Since apparently only one stockpile can {{k|t}}ake from a stockpile at a given time, the local piles must be chained to take from each other. There should be two big central booze and prepared food stockpiles where the first local pile takes its stocks from, to avoid clutter in the kitchens. Preferably somewhere near the grand dining hall. Dedicated food haulers will take care of the distribution.
* There should be a central living area near the dining hall for dwarves that work in various places all around the fortress: miners and engravers.
* The military needs a living area near the depot, the siege operators can't be too far from their machines. Consider a military vomitorium to fight cave adaption.
* A separate lever area should hold a pump operator in a lockable area.
* Centralized catacombs for burial deep down. Since burying a dismembered dwarf might take a long time in such a setting, I use a wake room closer to the surface where the dwarves will be buried in a coffin which will be deconstructed later on to have their bones transferred to the catacombs. Since z-level is not taken into account in pathfinding, coffins in the catacombs should only be allowed for burial on demand when theres bones to transfer.

Mistakes I made last time:
* Living areas should be below the workshops even on woodless maps, otherwise they will be susceptible to fighting and siege engine noise from the surface.

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:06, 25 May 2009
Line 25:		Line 25:
	Mistakes I made last time:		Mistakes I made last time:
	* Living areas should be below the workshops even on woodless maps, otherwise they will be susceptible to fighting and siege engine noise from the surface.		* Living areas should be below the workshops even on woodless maps, otherwise they will be susceptible to fighting and siege engine noise from the surface.
−	~~<sup>Superscript text</sup>~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I tend to forget my thoughts on design strategy in between fortress builds, so I put them here.
 =Defense=
 My next fortress will use a "three lane" approach to fortress defense: three mutually exclusive routes that lead into my fort.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 I tend to forget my thoughts on design strategy in between fortress builds, so I put them here.
-==Defense==
+=Defense=
 My next fortress will use a "three lane" approach to fortress defense: three mutually exclusive routes that lead into my fort.
@@ Line 13: / Line 12: @@
 * Make siege lane magma floodable to get rid of any gobbo crap dropped there. Drawback: needs replenishable magma source, more work, less fps due to fluid movement. Advantage: magma.
-==Bedroom/workshop design==
+=Bedroom/workshop design=
 For my last two fortresses I used the [[Bedroom_Design#Decentralized_Living|decentralized living]] plan along with [[Design_strategies#Decentralized_Workshop_Complex|decentralized workshops]]. I had four work/living complexes more or less symmetrically around a central grand dining hall. The big advantage is that it accomodates for various workshop area constraints, e.g. having the butchery close to the surface for a refuse area vent, the kitchen near the farm near the soil area, but the forges close to the magma. Two major drawbacks are the necessity of complex micro management for the bedrooms, and the increased complexity of the noise problem. Placing a tower cap farm can be tricky when there are bedrooms everywhere.
@@ Line 26: / Line 25: @@
 Mistakes I made last time:
 * Living areas should be below the workshops even on woodless maps, otherwise they will be susceptible to fighting and siege engine noise from the surface.