40d Talk:Current events - Revision history

QuietBot: moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aCurrent events to 40d Talk:Current events: Fixing talk page name (157/738)

2010-03-08T21:43:53Z

moved Talk:Broken/40d\x3aCurrent events to 40d Talk:Current events: Fixing talk page name (157/738)

Briess: moved Talk:Current events to Talk:40d:Current events: 40d namespace migration

2010-03-08T01:52:57Z

moved Talk:Current events to [[Talk:40d:Current events]]: 40d namespace migration

LegacyCWAL at 21:17, 21 February 2009

2009-02-21T21:17:20Z

N9103: Just doing some big changes, so '''''something''''' is done with the page, instead of nothing, like it has been for months.

2008-12-18T02:45:21Z

Just doing some big changes, so '''''something''''' is done with the page, instead of nothing, like it has been for months.

Plac1d at 16:34, 24 November 2007

2007-11-24T16:34:39Z

Janus: New page: I think it's probably best to only update this when new versions are released, to serve as a list of changes for that version. Otherwise, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to me.
A...

2007-11-24T08:09:06Z

New page: I think it's probably best to only update this when new versions are released, to serve as a list of changes for that version. Otherwise, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to me.<br> A...

New page

I think it's probably best to only update this when new versions are released, to serve as a list of changes for that version. Otherwise, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to me.<br>
After several smaller version releases or a large release I think it should also have the oldest stuff culled to keep the page from getting unwieldy. Does this sound like a decent plan for the page? --[[User:Janus|Janus]] 03:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 21 February 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Maybe this would work a lot better as something other than a version tracking page?<br>		Maybe this would work a lot better as something other than a version tracking page?<br>
	I honestly don't know what it '''''should''''' be, but it needs to become something that actually gets attention. --[[User:N9103\|Edward]] 21:45, 17 December 2008 (EST)		I honestly don't know what it '''''should''''' be, but it needs to become something that actually gets attention. --[[User:N9103\|Edward]] 21:45, 17 December 2008 (EST)
		+	:If release notes is all this page gets used for, it might be better just to delete it and put said notes as part of the relevant version category page. Or something along those lines. --[[User:LegacyCWAL\|LegacyCWAL]] 16:17, 21 February 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:45, 18 December 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	</nowiki></pre>		</nowiki></pre>
	:If you do this, you may need to change ''DF release notes'' to ''DF developement notes''. [[User:Plac1d\|Plac1d]] 11:34, 24 November 2007 (EST)		:If you do this, you may need to change ''DF release notes'' to ''DF developement notes''. [[User:Plac1d\|Plac1d]] 11:34, 24 November 2007 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	Looking at the complete lack of attention the page has gotten, I decided to completely clear the page.<br>
		+	Maybe this would work a lot better as something other than a version tracking page?<br>
		+	I honestly don't know what it '''''should''''' be, but it needs to become something that actually gets attention. --[[User:N9103\|Edward]] 21:45, 17 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 24 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I think it's probably best to only update this when new versions are released, to serve as a list of changes for that version. Otherwise, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to me.<br>		I think it's probably best to only update this when new versions are released, to serve as a list of changes for that version. Otherwise, it doesn't seem to serve much purpose to me.<br>
	After several smaller version releases or a large release I think it should also have the oldest stuff culled to keep the page from getting unwieldy. Does this sound like a decent plan for the page? --[[User:Janus\|Janus]] 03:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)		After several smaller version releases or a large release I think it should also have the oldest stuff culled to keep the page from getting unwieldy. Does this sound like a decent plan for the page? --[[User:Janus\|Janus]] 03:09, 24 November 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	:OK, that makes sense. In addition to the dev notes, I think you should also include the release notes that are included within the new version downloads (in "release notes.txt" and "file changes.txt")So for the .33c update, you'll add:
		+	<pre><nowiki>
		+	Release notes for 0.27.169.33c:
		+
		+	Continuing along with bug fixing. See the dev log for other minor changes.
		+
		+	******************************************************
		+
		+	Auxiliary file changes for 0.27.169.33c:
		+
		+	New init options
		+	[PRIORITY:NORMAL]
		+	</nowiki></pre>
		+	:If you do this, you may need to change ''DF release notes'' to ''DF developement notes''. [[User:Plac1d\|Plac1d]] 11:34, 24 November 2007 (EST)

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:43, 8 March 2010
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:52, 8 March 2010
(No difference)