v50 Steam/Premium information for editors
- v50 information can now be added to pages in the main namespace. v0.47 information can still be found in the DF2014 namespace. See here for more details on the new versioning policy.
- Use this page to report any issues related to the migration.
This notice may be cached—the current version can be found here.
Editing 40d Talk:Wealth
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
You are editing a page for an older version of Dwarf Fortress ("Main" is the current version, not "40d"). Please make sure you intend to do this. If you are here by mistake, see the current page instead.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
| Latest revision | Your text | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
::Well, this can be achieved by editing raws I assume, but I still don't see it to be a very useful thing to stick into a section on wealth. [[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 01:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ::Well, this can be achieved by editing raws I assume, but I still don't see it to be a very useful thing to stick into a section on wealth. [[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 01:51, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
::However, his more recent edit attempt sorta shows that this could possibly be achieved without *cheating* per se. If you can actually get the value of wealth to be over whatever value (I think around 2.15 billion most likely) without cheating, which, in theory someone could do with enough artifacts. If that's the case, then a section explaining negative wealth might be useful for those 1 in 100000 people that get their wealth so high that it becomes negative. However, if not the case. I still see no use. [[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 01:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ::However, his more recent edit attempt sorta shows that this could possibly be achieved without *cheating* per se. If you can actually get the value of wealth to be over whatever value (I think around 2.15 billion most likely) without cheating, which, in theory someone could do with enough artifacts. If that's the case, then a section explaining negative wealth might be useful for those 1 in 100000 people that get their wealth so high that it becomes negative. However, if not the case. I still see no use. [[User:Shardok|Shardok]] 01:53, 28 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | |||